Edit ModuleShow Tags
Edit ModuleShow Tags

'Disloyal' Jimmy John's Workers Lost their Protections


Published:

A federal appeals court ruled in favor of MikLin Enterprises, a franchisee of 10 Jimmy John’s shops in Minnesota, saying employees there were “so disloyal” they were not covered by labor rules protecting unionization activity.

Pro-union workers had illustrated their opposition to the sandwich shops’ sick leave policy (or lack thereof) by putting up provocative posters in 2011 that purported to show one sandwich made by a healthy worker and one by a sick one. “Can’t tell the difference? That’s too bad because Jimmy John’s workers don’t get paid sick pay,” the poster said.

In the ruling filed July 3, the court said workers' comments aren’t protected by labor law when they are a “sharp, public, disparaging attack upon the quality of the company’s product and its business policies.” The court “declines to enforce the determination that MikLin violated the act by disciplining and discharging those employees and by soliciting removal of the unprotected posters.”

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit overturned an earlier ruling, by a three-judge panel of the same court, that had upheld the National Labor Relations Board decision in 2014 that the workers’ rights had been violated. The six workers in question were to be rehired and given back pay. MikLin Enterprises asked for and received a full court hearing.

The court upheld another finding in the case, agreeing that MikLin Enterprises violated labor law when supervisors encouraged employees to harass one of the workers who was also a leader in the move to unionize, the Star Tribune said.

The union-organizing drive at MikLin, led by the IWW or Industrial Workers of the World, failed by an 87-85 votes in October 2010. The poster campaign commenced in 2011.

Edit Module
Edit ModuleShow Tags
Edit ModuleShow Tags
Edit ModuleShow Tags
Edit ModuleShow Tags
Edit ModuleShow Tags
Edit ModuleShow Tags


Covers everything from good news to bad judgment

About This Blog

The latest news, opinions and commentary on what's happening in the franchise arena that could affect your business.

Tom KaiserTom Kaiser is associate editor of Franchise Times. He can be reached at 612.767.3209, or send story ideas to tkaiser@franchisetimes.com.
 
Beth EwenBeth Ewen is editor-in-chief of Franchise Times. She can be reached at 612.767.3212, or send story ideas to bewen@franchisetimes.com.
 
Nicholas UptonNicholas Upton is staff writer at Franchise Times. He can be reached at 612.767.3226, or send story ideas to nupton@franchisetimes.com.
 
Mary Jo LarsonLaura Michaels is managing editor of Franchise Times. She can be reached at 612.767.3210, or send story ideas to lmichaels@franchisetimes.com.
 
Mary Jo LarsonMary Jo Larson is the publisher of Franchise Times Magazine and the Restaurant Finance Monitor.  You can find her on Twitter at
 twitter.com/mlarson1011.
 
Nancy WeingartnerNancy Weingartner is editor-at-large of Franchise Times magazine and the editor of the Food On Demand media project. You can reach her at 612-767-3200 or at nancyw@franchisetimes.com.
Follow her on Twitter at http://twitter.com/nanweingartner.
 

Archives

Categories

Feed

Atom Feed Subscribe to the Franchise Times News Feed »

Recent Posts