Edit ModuleShow Tags
Edit ModuleShow Tags

Judge Mulls Proposed McDonald's/NLRB Settlement


Published:

More than three years have passed since the National Labor Relations Board’s bombshell in late 2014, when it said it would hold McDonald’s liable for alleged workplace violations along with its franchisees as a “joint employer.” 

The franchise community went ballistic, saying the decision meant the end of franchising as we know it. Union and workers’ rights advocates, on the other hand, hailed the move as the only way to hold employers accountable for how they treat employees.

Now all the gnashing of teeth, spilling of ink and doomsday predictions have resulted in a proposed settlement between the parties, which is being considered by Administrative Law Judge Lauren Esposito and could be decided at any time. McDonald’s and the NLRB urge the settlement’s approval. 

Mary Joyce Carlson, an attorney for Fight for $15 and the SEIU, Service Employees International Union, issued a statement after the April hearing saying the proposed settlement “does nothing to hold the $5 billion company accountable for violating its workers’ rights.” She called it a “sham settlement.” Carlson did not return a request for comment. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., is among those opposing the settlement.

David Kaufmann, an attorney with Kaufmann Gildin & Robbins who represents many franchisors but is not involved in this case, isn’t sure when a decision will come.

 “Anybody who predicts when the NLRB is going to approve a settlement is out of his or her mind. You just can’t tell,” he said in late April. But he does predict the standard for declaring “joint employer” will revert to its pre-Browning-Ferris days, meaning the employer has to exhibit direct control in order to be held liable as a joint employer. 

(Browning-Ferris said the standard was the mere right to control terms and conditions of employment, regardless of whether that right was actually exercised.)

“I’ve been saying at the depths of this thing, when some lawyers were running around saying the sky is falling, I was saying everybody just calm down. This is going to pass. It will not survive judicial challenge. It can’t. It so conflicts with the law,”Kaufmann said.

Edit Module
Edit ModuleShow Tags
Edit ModuleShow Tags
Edit ModuleShow Tags
Edit ModuleShow Tags
Edit ModuleShow Tags
Edit ModuleShow Tags


Covers everything from good news to bad judgment

About This Blog

The latest news, opinions and commentary on what's happening in the franchise arena that could affect your business.

Tom KaiserTom Kaiser is senior editor of Franchise Times. He can be reached at 612.767.3209, or send story ideas to tkaiser@franchisetimes.com.
 
Beth EwenBeth Ewen is editor-in-chief of Franchise Times. She can be reached at 612.767.3212, or send story ideas to bewen@franchisetimes.com.
 
Nicholas UptonNicholas Upton is restaurants editor at Franchise Times. He can be reached at 612.767.3226, or send story ideas to nupton@franchisetimes.com.
 
Laura MichaelsLaura Michaels is managing editor of Franchise Times. She can be reached at 612.767.3210, or send story ideas to lmichaels@franchisetimes.com.
 
Mary Jo LarsonMary Jo Larson is the publisher of Franchise Times Magazine and the Restaurant Finance Monitor.  You can find her on Twitter at
 twitter.com/mlarson1011.
 

Archives

Categories

Feed

Atom Feed Subscribe to the Franchise Times News Feed »

Recent Posts